This post is part of a series on category theory, see Overview of Blog Posts for a list of all posts. As always, knowing the background of every single example is not required to understand the general concept. All categories are assumed to be locally small.
Introduction
In this post, we shall study another fundamental notion of category theory that arises with remarkable ubiquity: adjoint functors. Given a functor, one can think of an adjoint as a very weak form of an inverse. There are close connections to representable functors, limits and equivalences. Knowing the basics about adjunctions of functors can be quite useful as they enjoy a non-empty set of nice properties. For illustrative purposes, we shall start by studying the special case of adjunctions between partially ordered sets, which are called Galois connections.
Galois Connections
Definition C8.1 Let and
be partially ordered sets (i.e. each comes equipped with a reflexive,transitive and antisymmetric relation), then a map
is called
- isotone, if for all
we have
.
- antitone, if for all
we have
.
Remark If one considers and
as categories (note that every partially ordered set is in particular preordered, so cf. example C1.5), then isotone maps correspond to covariant functors and antitone maps correspond to contravariant functors.
Definition C8.2 Let and
be partially ordered sets, then a covariant (or contravariant, respectively) Galois connection from
to
consists of the following data:
- An isotone (or antitone, respectively) map
- An isotone (or antitone, respectively) map
Such that the following condition holds:
- For all
and
, we have
We write
Example C8.3 Let be a map. Then the power sets
and
are partially ordered by inclusion, and we have isotone maps
and
and it holds that
for all
, so this is an example of a Galois connection.
Example C8.4 Let be a group and let
be a normal subgroup. Then consider the partially ordered sets of all subgroups of
and
, respectively. Let
be the canonical projection map. Then one can define maps
and
. As in the last example, we have
, so this is an example of a Galois connection.
Example C8.5 Let and
be commutative rings and let
be a ring homomorphism. Then we can consider the sets of all ideals of
and
, respectively, denoted by
and
.
and
are partially ordered by inclusion and we have isotone maps
(the ideal generated by
)
, called extension and contraction. One has that
for all
, so this yields another example of a Galois connection.
Example C8.6 The eponymous example of a Galois connection comes from Galois theory. Let be any field extension. Then one can consider
and the set of all subgroups of
, denoted by
and the set of all intermediate fields
, both partially ordered by inclusion. Then one has antitone maps
and
. One checks that
, so that this is a contravariant Galois connection.
Example C8.7 Now for a geometric example. Let be an algebraically closed field. Then the set of subsets
is partially ordered by inclusion. On the other hand, consider the set of all ideals in
,
, partially ordered by inclusion. then we have antitone maps
and
. We have that
. The sets
are sets that “cut out” via polynomial equations. The example is geometric in the sense that many common geometric subsets of say
(although this is not algebraically closed) can be defined via polynomial equations, such as circles, lines, parabolas, hyperbolas, conics etc.
To see that the notion of Galois connections is useful, let’s prove something.
Lemma C8.8 Let and
be partially ordered sets and
,
be isotone maps that form a Galois connection, i.e.
. Then we have
for all
and
for all
.
Proof We have and hence
as
. Applying
using isotonicity, we obtain
. On the other hand, we get that
and hence
as
. Thus by antisymmetry, we obtain
. The other statement is proved analogously.
Corollary C8.9 Let and
be partially ordered sets and
,
be antitone maps that form a contravariant Galois connection, i.e.
. Then
for all
and
for all
.
Proof Replace by the opposite category to obtain a covariant Galois connection, now apply the previous result.
Definition C8.10 Let and
be partially ordered sets and
,
be either two isotone or two antitone maps that form a Galois connection. Then call
closed if and only if
for some
. Similarly, call
closed if and only if
for some
.
Corollary C8.11 Let and
be partially ordered sets and
,
be either two isotone or two antitone maps that form a Galois connection, i.e.
. Then the maps
and
induce a bijection between the closed elements of
and the closed elements of
. Furthermore,
is closed if and only if
and
is closed if and only if
.
Proof Clear from lemma C8.8 and C8.9 by the equations and
.
Definition C8.12 Let and
be partially ordered sets and
,
be either two isotone or two antitone maps that form a Galois connection, i.e.
. Then the maps
and
are called closure operators.
Remark To motivate the terminology, note that is the smallest closed element of
containing
.
Example C8.13 Let be a group and
be a normal subgroup and consider the Galois connection from example C8.4. As the projection
is surjective, we have
for any subgroup
of
, so every subgroup of
is closed. On the other hand, it’s easy to see that for a subgroup
of
, we have
if and only if
, in general
is the subgroup generated by
and
. It follows that
and
induce order-preserving bijections between subgroups of
and subgroups of
containing
by corollary 8.11, which recovers a well-known fact from group theory.
Example C8.14 Let be a field extension, then applying corollary 8.11 to the Galois connection from example C8.6, we obtain an order-reversing bijection between intermediate extensions of the form
for some subgroup
and subgroups of
of the form
for some intermediate extension
. If
is algebraic and Galois, then one can show that every intermediate extension is closed, and that the closed subgroups are the subgroups which are closed in the topology which has a basis at the identity by
for all intermediate extensions
such that
has finite degree. The correspondence between intermediate extensions and closed subgroups is the main result of Galois theory. (In the finite case, the topology is discrete and hence every subgroup is closed.)
Example C8.15 Let be an algebraically closed field and let
be a natural number. Then consider the Galois connection between subsets of
and ideals in
. One can show that the subsets of
of the form
for an ideal
form the closed subsets of a topology on
, called the Zariski topology. Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz may be stated in the form
. An ideal
is called radical if
. From the formalism of Galois connections, in particular corollary 8.16, we obtain an order-reversing bijection between subsets in
that are cut out by polynomials and radical ideals in
. The difficult part here is computing the closure operator, the rest is a formality. This is an important bridge between algebra and geometry.
Adjunctions via Hom-Sets
Definition C8.16 Let and
be categories and let
and
be functors. Then an adjunction of the pair
is given by a natural isomorphism of functors
. If an adjunction exists,
and
are called adjoint, denoted by
. In this case,
is called left adjoint to
and
is called right adjoint to
.
Exercise Verify that the notion of an adjunction specializes to that of a Galois connection in the case of partially ordered sets.
Example C8.17 Consider the category of commutative rings and the full subcategory of reduced commutative rings
. We have a forgetful functor
. We also have a functor
that sends a ring
to the associated reduced ring
, the quotient by the nilradical. As every ring homomorphism
from any commutative ring
to a reduced commutative ring
factors uniquely through
, we obtain a natural bijection between ring homomorphisms
and ring homomorphisms
, so that the functor
is left adjoint to the forgetful functor
.
Example C8.18 Let and
be rings and let
be a
-bimodule. Then we have a functor
given by
, this functor has a left adjoint given by the tensor product
.
Example C8.19 Consider the category of small categories. We have a functor
which sends a small category to its set of objects. Given a set
we can form the discrete category
on
(see example C1.4 for details). Now a functor
for some category
is determined uniquely by a map
: As the only morphisms in
are identities, the action of a functor on morphisms is determined completely by the action on objects. Thus
is left adjoint to
.
Example C8.20 Let be the following category: objects are pairs
, where
is a commutative ring and
is a multiplicatively closed subset and morphisms
are ring homomorphisms
such that
. Let
be the category of commutative rings. We have a functor
sending
to
. The universal property of localization may be stated by saying that this functor has a left adjoint given by
.
Example C8.21 Let be a complete normed field, such as
,
(or even
,
etc.). Now consider the category of normed vector spaces over
with bounded linear maps as morphisms, denoted by
and the full subcategory of complete normed spaces, i.e. Banach spaces over
. We have a forgetful functor
. We also have the completion functor
. As bounded linear maps are uniformly continuous and every normed space is dense in its completion, we get that for a normed space
and a complete normed space
, every bounded linear map
extends uniquely to a bounded linear map
, where
denotes the completion of
. This shows that the completion functor is left adjoint to the forgetful functor
.
An analogy with linear algebra
The terminology “adjunction” comes from an analogy with linear algebra. Let and
be categories. Then these come equipped with their respective Hom-functors
,
. One can think of these Hom functor as being analogous to inner products. Then the Yoneda lemma tells us that these inner products are non-degenerate. In this analogy, for two functors
and
, having a natural isomorphism
corresponds to having an equality
for two inner product spaces
and linear maps
,
, which is what defines
to be the adjoint map to
.